All times are UTC


It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:49 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:36 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 301
Valamir wrote:
True, but in my experience, when Isengard flattens Gondor it is because the normal uruks are doing their job, while the heroes keep Boromir from doing his.


Agreed.

Nazghul + Morannon orcs are even worse thou.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:56 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
@The Horde Lord- They can be- it depends on how the controlling player does with them. I prefer uruks simply because the F4 results in you winning draws, while two or three heavy armored, shielded uruks are usually enough to keep Boromir in place for a while.

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:48 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 301
Good point Valamir.

Ok, here is another hypotetical WYSIWYG issue. Is it OK to use a Nazghul as another Nazghul? I mean, people can't be expected to buy 8 regular, 9 named and some extra Witch Kings and a fell beast. On the other hand it's nice to have these economic bouderies (can't believe I wrote that), so you have prioritize.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:57 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
In the case of expensive models, like Nazgul, where you just want to do a 1-for-1 swap, then I personally have no problem with it, providing that I know I'm shooting at Khamul and not the Shadow Lord. But then I tend to be pretty lenient, particularly with those who have a smaller collection than I. Unless, of course, you are trying to use one army to pose as another. That is a no-no. :)

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:26 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 301
Yeah, I guess I'd be fine with the Nazghul swap. But if you dare use named nazghul + unnamed nazghul on me, then I'll get kind of mad. Gotta stay with the fluff.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:06 am 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
Do you mean you don't like of your opponant has one named Ringwraith and one Generic one?

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:46 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
Not at all, merely that if you are going to make use of two unnamed Nazgul (particularly on Fellbeast) to be the Shadow Lord and Random Nazgul with no distinguishing characteristics, then one might have issues.

@Gothmog- otherwise, I personally like to play with the unnamed boys (mostly) and will use the actual named models to represent who they are supposed to be (or use just one unnamed or whatever happens to work in a given situation).

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:32 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 5:58 pm
Posts: 236
i think that WYSIWYG is ok, but , especially with newer players who have less models, it can sometimes be a bit difficult to have exactly what you want, so i think you shold be a bit lenient.

also, i would rather see someone play using a painted, unbroken figure as a slightly different model than someone play with something that is broken or is still waiting to be painted, i think it makes the game look a lot better.

butreally, unless you are in a proper tournemant, be a bit flexible and have a good time
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:21 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 787
Location: The Netherlands
Images: 3
I use scratch-built high elf knights with double swords as galadhrim knights. GW forgot to bring out High elf knights sadly, so I thought giving them 2 handweapons would be the best option. the extra defence of the shields is represented by better armour, while shielding is represented by an extra blade to use. What do you think of this models in WYSIWYG(by the way I'm talking about SBG)

_________________
Ours is the fury!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:16 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
Ooh, sounds nice. I'd be most interested in seeing pictures. Does the second hand weapon give them an extra attack or is there any benefit to it at all?

Otherwise I think it sounds fine, though I personally would use the shield.

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:42 am 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:07 am
Posts: 228
Location: New zealand
Valamir wrote:
Ooh, sounds nice. I'd be most interested in seeing pictures. Does the second hand weapon give them an extra attack or is there any benefit to it at all?

Otherwise I think it sounds fine, though I personally would use the shield.


From what he wrote its got the exactly the same rules as the Galadhrim knights..

I don't understand why you would prefer the shield though if its exactly the same rules(so it counts as if he had a shield anyway). The only reason you would want a shield over the other hand weapon is for looks.. and well you haven't even seen the models yet so how do you know which looks better?
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:49 am 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 787
Location: The Netherlands
Images: 3
I don't use shields because it they would have only defence 5, while they look like having heavy armour and a shield.and no, they don't have houserules in my games, so the word count as only being used to block attacks

_________________
Ours is the fury!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:48 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
Since they are not actually being houseruled to D6 (which is why I would take the shield on a high-elf) then I completely understand the choice of representation. Do you have pictures?

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:00 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:48 am
Posts: 787
Location: The Netherlands
Images: 3
Valamir wrote:
Since they are not actually being houseruled to D6 (which is why I would take the shield on a high-elf) then I completely understand the choice of representation. Do you have pictures?

I'm redoing the horses, and when they are finished you'll see the command in the painting challenge

_________________
Ours is the fury!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Where od you stand on WYSIWYG?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:49 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 474
Images: 7
I look forward to seeing them!

_________________
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: