Gah, too much to reply to!
(btw the emoticons on this site are odd and rarely seem to represent the face I want...)
Sacrilege83 wrote:
I'm going to have to side with Dezartfox on this one, he's right. It's all about the almighty $ now and not making customers happy. Stop trying to sugar coat things Lorizael
Of course it's all about the money. But money is made from keeping people happy. Obviously recent events have made some people unhappy which is going to have a negative impact on the cash.
I still think it's a minority that are actually [word deleted] off enough to lessen their spending or change game systems. We've all got an emotional attachment to our hobby and gamers are want to grumble when things change.
Some have every right to be mad- the aussies because they pay too much in comparison (btw I support the shipping embargo but not the ridiculous pricing in the southern hemisphere) and any LotR fan because GW pays very small lip-service to the range. (though of course we all know that will change once the Hobbit gravy-train appears...)
Sacrilege83 wrote:
You guys say that 8 GBP is nothing for one model. I don't know how much that translates into Canadian but it costs $16+tx over here. For $16 cdn I can get 12 litres of milk or 5 loafs of bread. Does one small plastic model (and forget about the idea of it being a character, but taking it for what it really is) equals to that? Then you get this one character model plus another different plastic character model, then you're up to $32 cdn quickly. You can buy a bloody box of 10 plastics or more for that amount! And you guys think that this isn't a bit devious?
Price is a funny thing and something that means different things to different people. People pay for something if they think it's worth the money. This is true with every consumer product and not just GW.
Compared to what characters cost in Finecast and in metal, £8 for a plastic character is sweet. As soon as GW make some of these new plastic characters for an army I collect I'll be buying plenty.
In comparison to the number of models you get in a regular unit box of course it's dispraportionate. Plastic characters at £5 would be reasonable to me. But I understand that plastic moulds are expensive and due to volume of sales, these character models probably aren't too profit heavy.
Sacrilege83 wrote:
If GW was still at affordable prices I would already be making a second WHFB army, but thanks to their price gouging that stopped that idea. All for the better I suppose.
Again, it's an individual thing. I currently own 8 armies across the 3 main games and I'm contemplating another 2 armies in the near future maybe. All of the models are current and in many places I've replaced older models with the newer as they came out (GK for example) and sold off the old models.
I really don't have a huge income and have very little disposable cash each month. Warhammer is still an affordable hobby to me as I choose what I want sensibly and don't have any other hobbies.
There are models available for some of my armies that I would never buy due to the cost- Landraiders are too expensive and not worth the cost in my eyes, so I'll never by one.
Sacrilege83 wrote:
Still I like you Lorizael, nothing personal
Love you too dude
Oldman Willow wrote:
I can't find any happy people at a GW shop because they all closed because they made their customers un-happy.
I guess this is situational. I'm in the UK- GW opened up like 10 stores here last year and I currently live within a short traveling distance of about 10 stores.
Oldman Willow wrote:
They don't sell at all when the Kids are exposed to the other games.
I think this can vary. Of course as soon as a new customer is offered choice there is a greater likelyhood that they may go for a different system. But there are still many advantages to a starter that GW has over rival companies.
If we take PP and Warmachine as an example. To get the equivalent number of models/rules etc to start up in Warmachine it costs more than any of the GW starter sets (PP have just released WM starter set for £70 with 17 models and a small rulebook-good move!).
A new GW collector has a huge amount of support in terms of GW stores. They offer beginner classes, painting lessons, places to play and hep with anything warhammer related that someone new might need. PP can't offer this because they sell through independants. The majority of independants I've ever visited are small, dark little holes with limited ranges and a grumpy owner who offers very little in the way of support to new hobbyists. Of course there are some great independants, but from my experience they are in the minority. PP of course have their Pressgangers now which helps to address this, but it's not quite the same level of support.
Based on those two things which do you think appeals to a parent more? Would they rather spend more cash for less product and have hardly anywhere to use it and probably see it all ruined by the over-enthusiastic kid; or would they rather get more for their cash and have supportive shop staff who will bend over backwards so that little Jonny gets the most out of his new toys?
Of course being in the Uk we do have this luxury of lots of GW stores- I'm aware the situation is different around the world.
Quote:
That is quite alright I don't agree with you either
But isn't that what forums are about?
Aww, cute puppy!
Lord Hurin wrote:
Lots of stuff.
It's not so much leaping to GW's defence as offering a differnt point of view or possible explanations. People are allowed to bash them so those of us who love warhammer and the GW hobby should be able to support GW no?
Finecast evokes a lot of mixed up feelings for me...
The messed up finecost logo is funny and is representative of a lot of the Devlan Mud that appeared in the first week of the finecast release. GW obviously dropped the ball and either rushed the release or just didn't apply enough QC before sending everything to the stores. That doesn't annoy me so much- I can wait and exchange a few kits to get a good one, I'm patient enough. What really [word deleted] me off is the lack of apology. It wouldn't have been hard to just say "sorry, there are some issues with Finecast, we'll sort it out for you all asap".
In regards to the cost, I think some of it is justified... The finecast hitting the shelves now is pretty much spot on- GW have sorted out QC and the stuff I bought this weekend was perfect.
So, finecast is easier to work with, lighter, has crisper detail and is more resilient. It's a better quality product.
Higher quality = higher cost. This is true with virtually every consumer product out there. When Apple release the next Iphone/pad etc it will be more expensive than the current one. It will (hopefully) be better but the costs to the company are likely to be smaller because a lot of the infrastructure for producing them is already there. So cheaper to produce, higher quality and more money.
People fixate on the cost of resin being cheaper (is it really, do we know what exactly GW are putting in the models?) but what about the costs to make brand new moulds and set up brand new equipment? It's got to have been a huge outlay.
Still, I'm never paying £20 for Gandalf in finecast...
I think the smaller model companies can afford to offer more currently. As they grow and change as a business they will adopt more GW type practices- this is the way of the capatilist world!
Harfoot wrote:
I also make Forge World models,there is NO DIFFERENCE in the materials between Finecast & Forgeworld. No matter what people write.
No. I have a FW and a finecast models in my hands right now. They're different.
Oldman Willow wrote:
Supporter? I thought they were employees
Dezartfox doesn't do himself any favours discussing things while being a GW employee. He's also likely to get himself in truble for expressing views which may or may not be held by GW...