theavenger001 wrote:
For once this is a mini of your that I don't like that much up close. The distant pictures are amazing, the freehand looks great. But just that one up close picture shows (to me) that the freehand is messier than I am used to from you. Some of it (like the white stripes on the blue bit of cloth) looks like it is not covering well enough. It looks a little bit streaky, almost like you used craft paint instead of real figure paint. I also personally don't like the eyes, but that's just a stylistic thing, I don't like having the white so prominent.
There are some good things about it though. From a table top it would look outstanding, and I really like what you've done with the basing. A lot less busy than you normally do, but it works well. Aragorn's skin and beard are also well done. I do like the tree freehand on the back end, it's more the star on the front end that looks messy to me.
Hope that's helpful and not just bashing/disheartening.
agreed in general, but it's often useful to have zoomed in images to see detail you've missed. A magnifying glass cant offer that as it cant focus on the whole model.
Bear in mind that you are viewing an inch and a half figure magnified quite heavily and viewed under conditions that hopefully the owner would never view. I hate magnified images of my work in the same manner that if you look at art in a gallery up close, often the eye will see the rough textures that the eye will, from a distance, 'blend' the colours and the tones together. This is why I post very little in the way of images super zoomed so to speak as I prefer a 'reading distance' approach to the viewing of figures. If it looks good six inches away, it is good!