WhoelsebutHaldir wrote:
Well the getting left behind thing isn't a problem for me. I am going to be playing a predominantly infantry based Rohan army.
My main opponent plays Isengard, but as of right now he only has 8 crossbows. So I can avoid them if I put enough thought into my deployment and movement.
My primary concern about the huntsman was if he could pull his weight in points, because as previously stated, he can't lead troops. But it seems like you guys think he can be worth his while. So I'll try to give him a go next time I play a game.
Any more advice would be great though, so keep posting if you have anything else to say
Well yes and no. Its good that most Isengard named heros are only D5 so you can wound them on 5's. The bad part is, that most Isengard heros are not worth putting that much effort into because theyre all just tough in combat but not very valuable to the overall scheme of the force.....if he has a shaman, deploy him near that, and if he has Saruman, same. As for all the rest of the heros....meh.....theyre all about the same. Unless he has a Vrasku then target him. If someone he has none of these, go after banners and certain other important pieces.
But Isengard is generally a force you should have a hard time against because they are such a balanced force in terms of every warband being strong and regular troopers all being so potent, that taking out some set pieces of their army usually doesnt hinder them too much.
Personally I field, at 750:
Vrasku
12 X bows
Mauhur
12 Raiders
Shaman
12 Ferals
Ugluk
4 X bows
8 warriors with shield
There fore example, Id put my Shaman warband as far away from him as possible, and if you got him near the Shaman, Id have my other warband of X bows across from you. Then the other two warbands Id use for a variety of other things. Distraction, shields, and flanking.