The One Ring
https://wap.one-ring.co.uk/

wotr dueling
https://wap.one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=19438		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Shadowswarm [ Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:07 pm ]
Post subject:  wotr dueling
if i have a f. that has 2 heros (eg: a shaman and durburz) and an enemy hero calls a duel, can he specify who its against? and if so, can i 'counter duel' by calling a duel w/ durburz and saving my shaman?
Author:  Hashut's Blessing [ Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
When calling a duel, the "caller" decides whom it is against and there is no way of avoiding it. Epic Cowardice is to avoid it before it's called, but not to escape it once it's happening ;)
Author:  General Elessar [ Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
Actually, you can sort of avoid it. If in your example someone (let's say a Captain) called a duel on the Shaman, you could then call a duel with durburz on that Captain. Both players would then roll off to see whose duel was fought first. So, potentially, Durburz could kill the Captain before he fought his duel against the Shaman.
Author:  Hashut's Blessing [ Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
It's not technically avoiding the Duel, just instigating one, to have a 50-50 chance of your one succeeding. You lose the Might either way as well, so it doesn't seem worth it, lol.
Author:  Shadowswarm [ Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
well in the senariro with durburz and the shaman, its totaly worth it, as those shamans are 100pts a piece.... thats 5c worth of goblins!
Author:  Hashut's Blessing [ Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
I would argue that it's MORE worth it, but still risky since there is still the inherent likelihood of losing, as well as not necessarily being the successor in calling the duel to begin with.

Plus, if you don't upgrade them, it's almost 7 companies, lol :D
Author:  hithero [ Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
General Elessar wrote:
Actually, you can sort of avoid it. If in your example someone (let's say a Captain) called a duel on the Shaman, you could then call a duel with durburz on that Captain. Both players would then roll off to see whose duel was fought first. So, potentially, Durburz could kill the Captain before he fought his duel against the Shaman.

You actually have to roll of before making any heroic declarations - the opposite of SBG.
Author:  Hashut's Blessing [ Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
In which case it's pre-emptive and not countering ;)

But,t hanks for correcting me. Especially since it made my point all the more... poignant, lol :D
Author:  General Elessar [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
hithero wrote:
General Elessar wrote:
Actually, you can sort of avoid it. If in your example someone (let's say a Captain) called a duel on the Shaman, you could then call a duel with durburz on that Captain. Both players would then roll off to see whose duel was fought first. So, potentially, Durburz could kill the Captain before he fought his duel against the Shaman.

You actually have to roll of before making any heroic declarations - the opposite of SBG.


I don't understand. What do you roll off for before Heroic Declarations?
Author:  hithero [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: wotr dueling
Somebody declares that the want to make a heroic.
You then roll off to see who goes first and then take it in turns to nominate a model.
Then play out the actions in the order selected.
Its all on page 66
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/