I got to say I am not really satisfied by the explanation for the heroic action resolution.
Quote:
Q: If my opponent has Priority and chooses not to declare any Heroic
Actions in a specific phase, and then wishes to do so after I declare a
Heroic Action, can they still do so or has their opportunity to declare
Heroic Actions passed? (p.57)
A: Yes. Both players may continue to declare Heroic Actions back and
forth, starting with the player with Priority, until both players are
satisfied they have declared all the Heroic Actions they wish to.
What does this even mean? What are they saying "yes" to exactly? I can still read this both ways and it contradicts the rule book that makes players without priority choose first when both players want to declare actions. What does everyone else make of this?
The other thing I real do not like is that they just through up there hands on the Tom v. Floi problem and said "screw it! Floi can't affect three models now and that is just it" (not that they really said that). I do not know what I expected them to do but it just looks like they have been beaten by a bug in the rules and had to resort to invisible walls to stop it.
Other than that, though, I am glad their cleared up other things like with the Stormcaller's wind spell, the twins unbreakable bound rule, the golden king, and Mumak and Iron Hills Chariot with relation to magic.
{ PORTAL }
Print view
Top
