Thanks for the feedback. Definitely gives me something to think about. I wasn't necessarily thinking about trying to field too many different warrior types in a single battle. Just thinking I'd like the option to be able to mix and match units of a particular army on any given day for a pts match. Today I go with Wargs and Scouts. Tomorrow, I may feel like an all Uruk-hai warrior force. The next time Dunlendings, etc. Deep down, I have to admit that I really would very much like to have some figures of each type.
But, I can wait as I see your point. I think I am going at it the wrong way. I may be better of focusing on themes either by force types or by scenarios as you suggest. That will allow me to focus on collecting figures for only those at the moment. Then, gradually over time I will build my collection out and hopefully achieve my end desire as well. Thanks
Coenus Scaldingus wrote:
Well, there is no hard and fast rule concerning ratios of mounted troops or so. I rarely see any cavalry in a Galadhrim/Wood Elf force, while Rohan or Harad can field decent all-mounted forces. Bows at 1/3rd (or whatever the force's limit is, 1/2 sometimes) will often be the case (there is a limit for a reason: having ranged weapons is good), although some forces with poor shooting (Moria, to a lesser extent Mordor) can go without any altogether.
In your particular case, I'd say there are two ways to go about it. Do you want to focus on collecting figures (having some of each type), or do you want to focus on collecting an army? Altough you will of course be able to field a decently sized force if you have collected some figures for each profile in the Isengard list, it's unlikely to perform very well on the table. Just the sheer number of different profiles on the table may get confusing! Starting in the reverse may then be more practical: choose a particular theme (Dunland, Scouts, siege of the Hornburg/Helm's Deep), calculate a 500-700pts army and then get the required models for that. For example, I've never seen an army with a handful of Ruffian archers, Uruk-hai scouts with bows, Uruk-hai crossbowmen and Warg Riders with bows. Instead, the full ranged contingent would be made up fully of a single one of those - some people like the power of a crossbow, others the optional mobility of normal bows, then choosing either those carried by decent combatants (Uruk-hai) or ones that are cheap and shoot just as well (Ruffians) (Orcs are pretty terrible either way, so probably won't make the list at all - unless given spears and used for the occasional shot rather than as dedicated archers).
That said, you can of course have a force with a good few different troop types - a solid core of Uruk-hai warriors with a fast group of Mauhur-led scouts on the flank and some warg riders on the other. Even so, you are unlikely to ever want several of all types of profile, while wanting more than a few of others. With countless variations, a collection is never really done - you may at some point want to expand your warband of scouts in order to have a small force of them, or see how a big warband of warg riders will do - but it's much more practical to see what you will need at the very least to have a playable force, and then expand on that depending on what you think will add nicely to it.