The One Ring
http://wap.one-ring.co.uk/

Which Camera do you have?
http://wap.one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=6383		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Morgul_King [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Which Camera do you have?
I was looking here in the OR, some posts that show pictures of the minis that the uses have!
Some of the pictures are very good, but there are some that doesn't have any detail, you can't understard if that's a dwarf or an elf. Horrible!!

So I thought making this Post so that all the users can know which cameras do the useres with the nice photos have!

I made this post also because I'm thinking of have a camera that can really take some pictures of minis!! The one that I have is terrible!

Hope y'all Can Help!!
Author:  Dorthonion [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
I use a Canon 20D. It is the baby brother of the Canon SLR range.

The Witch-Camera of Angmar....
Author:  DurinsBane [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Image

Kodak 5.0 megapixel EasyShare DX4530.

Before this, I had a Kodak EasyShare 3.1 camera, and before I accidently knocked it to the floor and broke it, I was so impressed with it, that I decided to go for the same again, albeit with more Mega Pixels.

Love my camera :D
Author:  Beatrice [ Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:33 am ]
Post subject: 
Image
I do have a Nikon Coolpix 5700. (It's now 3 years old, far older than my painting hobby, and so large that everybody thinks it's an Digital SLR ;-)

I was concerned about pic/colour quality, less as possible distortion and a large (in this case 8x) zoom.

I liked the turnable display from my older Nikon Coolpix 990, and definetely wouldn't go without such anymore.

also: I want to stick to one memorycard and one battery/accu system, because those cost much as well and I don't want to invest in those again at any new camera.

but I think that most brands deliver comparable good quality. (in this forum you find URLs for camera reviews) more important is the way you handle the cam, it's settings, the mini, the background, the light, and the digipic in the imaging editing program later on.
Author:  Howard A Treesong [ Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:47 am ]
Post subject: 
I have a Nikon F55, I thook this with it, but at such close range there's a narrow depth of field.

Image
Author:  Viruk [ Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:04 pm ]
Post subject: 
Image

Konica Minolta DIMAGE X60, I bought it about two months ago and I'm very satisfied with it.
Author:  BilboOfTheWhiteTower [ Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:09 pm ]
Post subject: 
I quite possible have the world's best camera in the 2 MP Fujifilm FinePix 2800Zoom. If you believe this is the world's best camera, I have some land to sell you too. :D

Image
Author:  Peregrin Took [ Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC H1

Image

I love it. ;) It has a 12x optical zoom and many other nice features, which is great, because photographing miniatures is not the only thing I use it for. I like the size also, all the new tiny cameras are horrible.
Author:  TheBucklandBrewer [ Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
I use Sony DSC-P8...

Image
Author:  MacGothmog [ Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:55 pm ]
Post subject: 
Image
Olympus C-370 (click to see features)

Nice to general pictures and not bad at all to shoot minis... quite cheap too!
Author:  lightning2911 [ Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:57 am ]
Post subject: 
Image
i have an older nikon coolpix 3500 and a canon 300D.

i think have to get a macro lens though to improve the mini images ...
Author:  Clarkmonster [ Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Canon Powershot A95
Image
I use a Canon Powershot A95, which I bought as an all-around shooter. It even takes a few minutes of MPEG. The macro ability of the camera is excellent. All the pictures in my gallery were taken with it. It has a ton of features for the price and I am very pleased with it.

For the pics I posted in my Work In Progress threads, I used my old Sony Mavica, which can get amazingly close-up but very low resolution pictures. The Mavica's low resolution produces a small size picture file, which is good for quick downloads (that's why I use it for the "in Progress" stuff). Even though you can probably pick up a 1st or 2nd gen Mavica for a song, I can't recommend it. With max resolution at less than a meg, it doesn't do justice to finished detail work on miniatures and makes terrible prints.

DC
Author:  Tobold Hornblower [ Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:38 am ]
Post subject: 
Image
I use an old 2 MegaPixel Nikon CoolPix 2100.
It takes reasonable close-up shots though, so I keep using it.
I'm actually dreading the day it packs up, because I love it so. :)
Author:  Melkor of Morgoth [ Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:34 am ]
Post subject:  I Used to HAve
I use to have an HP 735 (or is it 375). An older 3.2 MP 3x optical/6x digital camera. It was a great one, too bad it was stolen from my car the day I moved to Modesto. I'm hoping to get a new camera in a month or so though, then I can get some NEW photos into my gallery.

If you're looking into a camera, just make sure you have a macro mode on it or it'll be hard to photograph minis.
Author:  elfboi [ Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:15 pm ]
Post subject: 
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/K ... k_c330.asp

That is mine, not that brill for taking pics of minis, although i am no expert photographer so i may be doing something wrong.

Battery life is absolutely pants.
Author:  Curuní­r [ Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
elfboi wrote:
Battery life is absolutely pants.


"Pants" OK, I give. What does that mean? :?

I have a Kodak Easy Share 4.0 megapixels. Great for just about everything and cheap. I think the reason my miniature pictures look poor is because of the user. :wink:

Hej
Author:  elfboi [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:25 am ]
Post subject: 
Curunír wrote:
elfboi wrote:
Battery life is absolutely pants.


"Pants" OK, I give. What does that mean? :?

I have a Kodak Easy Share 4.0 megapixels. Great for just about everything and cheap. I think the reason my miniature pictures look poor is because of the user. :wink:

Hej


Pants=Rubbish
Author:  Raven [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:41 am ]
Post subject: 
anyone know of a cheapish cam thats good for close up's on models i need a rough estimate
Author:  Oldie [ Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
Well - since I sort of started a lot of the discussion on cameras in another thread - it's about time I threw in my findings/decisions

Thank you all for the various advice - I actually found it quite helpful

I decided that I could not afford (or did not want to) a Digital SLR that was capable of utilising my extensive range of specialist lenses for my 35mm camera collection that I built up during the days when I "worked"

Following the various advice that I received here - I "borrowed" an oldish Olympus and even put a couple of "shots" in my Gallery (one is still there)

From that little experiment I chose to buy a Vivitar ViviCam6300 which was on "special" (probably end-of-model because things change SO quickly)

I have used this new toy to take a variety of photos that I can then compare to my (somewhat expensive) SLR film camera - I am happily deleting about 90% of all shots that I take in whatever situation but am somewhat amazed at the quality that these little "toys" produce

All I need to do now is learn how to use ALL of its various features AND the software to make the piccies suitable for the internet

Thank You ALL once again for your advice



.
Author:  Curuní­r [ Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
Oldie wrote:
All I need to do now is learn how to use ALL of its various features AND the software to make the piccies suitable for the internet


That's where the fun begins. Good luck and welcome to the 21st century!
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/