Tobold Hornblower wrote:
KingofRohan888 wrote:
maybe an article on interviewing those people that don't get the fancy good painted models and dioramas and just like making a few jokesa and have a good time.
Um, we don't "get" the fancy good painted models. We get the stark, unpainted metal or plastic ones, same as you. It's time and effort that make them "fancy good". And I think we like making a few jokes and having a good time too. We're not aliens, you know.
Also, I think many of the people on that list of yours paint very well. This article is not elitist, but it seems to have hit a nerve with you. I recall another post of yours, aimed at Beatrice, along similar lines. I don't think the author intended to upset anyone, or imply that anyone here is better than anyone else. Your reaction is the reason some people are reluctant to be included in articles like this, which is a shame.
You prove once again to be a linguistic master Toblod. My thoughts exactly, although rather better put than I would do.
I have done one or two articles like this now, and have had good comments, but also negative ones. The sort of "why were they included" "why can't I be involved" sort of things.
I have put alot of time and effort into this hobby, to get where I am, and to be included in articles like this, and also to have nice comments made about my images make it worthwhile. Like Tobold said, we dont get the models, it takes time and effort to get the results. We don't do it to get praise or anything like that, we do it for the love of our hobby!
It's the one thing that unifies us as a community, the common interest of the love of the hobby, whichever facet you enjoy.
If you were to truely capture the community you would have to interview everyone! But in the end it is up to the person who does the interview as to who they include. If you want to include people KoR and think you can do a better job, then do it by all means!
Anyway, thank you for including me in this sully, and good work on a well put together article.